Analysis
The values of R/m
are very similarly related to the differences between experimental and
theoretical data. This confirms the validity of R/m
as an aid to adjusting the theoretical predictions. The downward bump
in the data for l = 0.5, q
= 35°, is also reflected in the differences between theoretical and
experimental data. On a larger scale: q
= 24° remains considerably greater than other values of q
. As l increases R/m
stabilises, this shows that the friction exerted on the object has a
limit. When the ratchet socket has a long slide the friction ceases to
increase. This indicates that the socket ratchet has to overcome initial
resistive force or friction.
The use of R/m
would greatly improve the accuracy of predictions of where an object
will fall when dropped down a slide, this is confirmed by its close
relation to the differences between the models.
Evaluation
On reflection, the experimental collection of data
went without any problems. All aspects mentioned when reducing error
were carefully followed to give accurate results when collecting the
experimental data. Using Excel to calculate the theoretical data saved
time in the long run. The formulae, after being type in once, could be
copied down to calculate all values of l and q
. The formulae in Excel were checked rigorously against written formulae
to minimise mistakes. Use of the program also made any error correction
of formulae easy. It was also very practical for displaying results in
tabulated and as graphs.
|